Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 37(3): 699-708, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31828481

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to describe the multidisciplinary approach and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) outcomes in adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients (ages 13-21) who underwent oocyte cryopreservation for fertility preservation (FP). METHODS: Multi-site retrospective cohort was performed from 2007 to 2018 at Northwestern University and Michigan University. Data were analyzed by chi-square test, t-test, and logistic regression. RESULTS: Forty-one patients began COH of which 38 patients successfully underwent oocyte retrieval, with mature oocytes obtained and cryopreserved without any adverse outcomes. To treat this group of patients, we use a multidisciplinary approach with a patient navigator. When dividing patients by ages 13-17 vs. 18-21, the median doses of FSH used were 2325 and 2038 IU, the median number of mature oocytes retrieved were 10 and 10, and median number frozen oocytes were 11 and 13, respectively. Median days of stimulation were 10 for both groups. There was no statistical difference in BMI, AMH, peak E2, FSH dosage, days stimulated, total oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes retrieved, and oocytes frozen between the two groups. Three patients were canceled for poor response. CONCLUSION: COH with oocyte cryopreservation is a feasible FP option for AYAs who may not have other alternatives when appropriate precautions are taken, such as proper counseling and having a support team. These promising outcomes correspond to similar findings of recent small case series, providing hope for these patients to have genetically related offspring in the future.


Subject(s)
Fertility Preservation , Fertility/physiology , Oocytes/growth & development , Ovulation Induction , Adolescent , Adult , Cryopreservation , Female , Fertilization in Vitro , Humans , Oocyte Retrieval/methods , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
2.
J Histochem Cytochem ; 68(1): 75-91, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31714169

ABSTRACT

Hyaluronan (HA) is a ubiquitous component of the extracellular matrix. The spatial-temporal localization of HA can be visualized in situ using biotinylated HA binding proteins (HABPs). This assay is sensitive to fixation conditions, and there are currently no best practices for HA detection. Thus, the goal of this study was to optimize fixation conditions for visualizing HA in the ovary, kidney, and liver through analysis of six commonly used fixatives for HA detection: Bouin's Solution, Carnoy's Solution, Ethanol-Formalin-Glacial Acetic Acid (EFG), Histochoice, Modified Davidson's Solution, and 10% Neutral Buffered Formalin. Organs were harvested from CB6F1 mice and fixed with one of the identified fixatives. Fixed organs were sectioned, and the HABP assay was performed on sections in parallel. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was also performed to visualize tissue architecture. HABP signal localization and intensity varied between fixatives. EFG and Carnoy's Solution best preserved the HA signal intensity in the ovary and liver, showing HA localization in various sub-organ structures. In the kidney, only Modified Davidson's Solution was less than optimal. Our findings demonstrate that fixation can alter the ability to detect HA in tissue macro- and microstructures, as well as localization in a tissue-specific manner, in situ.


Subject(s)
Hyaluronic Acid/metabolism , Kidney/metabolism , Liver/metabolism , Ovary/metabolism , Tissue Fixation/methods , Animals , Female , Humans , Mice , Organ Specificity , Rats , Tissue Embedding
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...